Register for updates

Read PDFs

Choose
text size

A A A A

Housing Finance
| Home | National Material | Local Material | Press Statements/Broadcasts | Stock Transfer | ALMO | PFI | Stock Options | Real Choice | Reports/Submissions | Press Archive | Pamphlets | Parliamentary Group | Labour Conference | DCH Conference | Lobby of Parliament | National Committe | NO Votes | Hills | Tenants Movement | Housing Bill | Housing Finance | How to Campaign | What You Can Do |
Supporting Documents and Key Resources

Initial submission to Review of Council Housing Finance

Impact of fully funding allowances to make council housing sustainable

Detailed version of 'Funding the Fourth Option' from 'Dear Gordon 2' pamphlet

How Government Robs our Rent Accounts - the figures and sources

Moonlight Robbery campaign

Stock Options for useful questions to ask to examine your council's financial case

Other useful documents
Local Government Association
02/07/08

LGA Labour Group
01/03/08

London Councils
06/12/07

19/11/07

UK Housing Review
06/12/05

UK Housing Review
06/12/05

Audit Commission
01/06/05

ODPM
01/06/03

House of Commons
16/11/00

Housing Finance made simple...

Politicians and housing professionals make out housing finance is very complicated but the principles for tenants are simple. Stop robbing council housing: all the money from our rents and capital receipts should be ring-fenced to manage, maintain, repair, improve and build new council housing (the 'Fourth Option'). Discrimination against council housing should end. We need a 'level playing field' so that council housing gets the same rights and access to gap funding, debt write-off and borrowing as other types of landlords.
In December 2007 Housing Minister Yvette Cooper announced a review of the current system with the commitment "to ensure that we have a sustainable, long term system for financing council housing".
This review is welcome, but is not reporting until 2009 with spending to be agreed in the next Comprehensive Spending Review.
DCH argues there has be interim measures to respect tenants' choice. We call for gap funding where tenants have voted for retention to improve their homes and estates, and an increase in Management & Maintenance Allowances (M&M) this year to support a moratorium on further privatisation while the review takes place.
The arguments are explained in more detail in our Dear Gordon 2 pamphlet and the initial submission to the government 'Review of Council Housing Finance'. DCH has also produced a spreadsheet modeling the Impact of fully funding allowances to make council housing sustainable.
There are links to supporting documentation with more details on the left, and press articles to the right.
See the CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) website for review papers, 'narratives' and forum.
Summary of DCH 'Initial Submission' to government review

"The fundamental problem facing council housing is insufficient resources to manage, maintain, repair and improve existing council homes and estates and to build new council housing.
If all the money that belongs to council housing (rental income and capital receipts) was ring-fenced and reinvested, and there was a level playing field on debt write-off, gap funding, borrowing and Social Housing Grant, council housing could pay its own way.
Successive governments have been taking a profit from council housing each year and then bullying and blackmailing tenants to accept privatisation. This is a disgrace!
The Treasury take from tenants rents and capital receipts far exceeds the allowances they give local authorities for management and maintenance (M&M) and major repairs (MRA) each year.
The recent ‘justification’ for some of this robbery is that tenants should support historic debt. But capital receipts from council housing have been enough to pay off this debt three times over; council tenants don’t have a financial interest in the property; and government doesn’t ‘recover’ money paid to home owners (Mortgage Interest Tax Relief) or Registered Social Landlords (Social Housing Grant) so why fleece council tenants to pay for an asset that remains in public ownership?
Continued discrimination against council housing and the lack of a ‘level playing field’ on debt write-off, gap funding, borrowing and Social Housing Grant cannot be justified.
It is not the principle of a national pooling system that is the problem. Council tenants are angry that government profits from council housing but we can also see how some politicians are using the old tactic of ‘divide and rule’ to try and break up a national council (public) housing sector.
We are suspicious that proposals for councils to ‘opt out’ of the national HRA would leave council housing in a more precarious situation and is a stalking horse for privatisation.
Government has to accept that M&M and MRA allowances must be funded at level of need and council housing put on a ‘level playing field’.
Then local authorities would be able to plan ahead on the same basis as other landlords and council housing would provide first class secure housing, managed by an accountable landlord at rents people can afford for existing tenants and future generations on a sustainable basis and ‘in perpetuity’."

Key organisations launched a My rent went to Whitehall position paper at the LGA conference on July 2 which endorses the key housing finance demands DCH and others have been making.
"This position paper sets out how the Local Government Association (LGA), London Councils, the Chartered Institute of Housing, CIPFA, the Councils with ALMOs Group (CWAG), the Association of Retained Council Housing (ARCH) and the National Federation of ALMOs (NFA) believe local authority housing finance should be changed."
It recognises "that the major repairs allowance is inadequate to cover costs of future major works. Management and maintenance allowances are also insufficient to sustain the stock and provide the services that tenants need..." and "local authorities to be able to maintain 100 per cent of capital receipts...", "the principle of a ring-fence extended to national level, with funds generated from HRA rents spent on improving council housing..." so that "councils and their tenants should have the same rights to self-determination as housing associations and their tenants and that they should have sufficient resources to enable them to manage their properties and their areas efficiently and effectively in perpetuity."
DCH is concerned that breaking up the national HRA system leaves tenants exposed to changes to interest rate, inflation and other risks and could make it easier to privatise homes and believe that requiring government to fully fund allowances to local authorities provides a more certain and less risky solution. We therefore welcome a clear commitment to ring fence resources for council housing and suggest that the mechanism for distributing these resources is looked at as a seperate issue.
Articles
The Guardian
13/08/08

Inside Housing
08/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
01/08/08

Inside Housing
25/07/08

Inside Housing
19/07/08

Inside Housing
11/07/08

Inside Housing
11/07/08

Inside Housing
04/07/08

Inside Housing
04/07/08

Public Finance
27/06/08

24dash
27/06/08

Inside Housing
20/06/08

Inside Housing
20/06/08

LGA Firstonline
18/06/08

Local Government News
17/06/08

Inside Housing
16/06/08

Guardian
04/06/08

Public Finance
30/05/08

24dash
21/05/08

BBC
16/05/08

Inside Housing
15/05/08

Inside Housing
15/05/08

Public Finance
09/05/08

Inside Housing
08/05/08

Inside Housing
18/04/08

Guardian
01/04/08

Inside Housing
21/03/08

Inside Housing
14/03/08

Public Finance
14/03/08

Inside Housing
10/01/08

Inside Housing
10/01/08

Inside Housing
14/12/07

Inside Housing
07/12/07

Inside Housing
30/11/07

Public Finance
23/11/07

Inside Housing
22/11/07

Inside Housing
16/11/07

24dash
22/05/06

Inside Housing
22/09/03